16. Indications for Stenting 1996-2001
TCTMD Slide Sets
TCTMD - The Great Debate Slide Sets
Education in Heart
Role of stenting in coronary revascularisation
Gershlick AH.
Heart 2001;86:104-12
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11410576
Underuse of coronary revascularization
procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization
Hemingway H, et al.
N Engl J Med 2001;344:645-54
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11228280
http://www.tctmd.com/ct/enewsletter-20010409/6122/?send_to=http://www.tctmd.com/journal-synopses/one.html?synopsis_id=2042
The underuse of coronary revascularization procedures is common. Medical
treatment for patients with indications for revascularization is associated with
higher mortality and a higher prevalence of angina over 2.5 years of follow-up,
as compared with patients who underwent coronary revascularization. Finally, the
integration of explicit measures of appropriateness into routine clinical
practice may improve long-term outcomes in these patients.
Coronary stenting beyond standard indications. Immediate and follow-up results
Finci L || Colombo A
Ital Heart J 2000;1:739-48
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=0011110516
Click here to view the full article in PDF
Coronary stenting in left main, calcified lesions, small vessels, diffuse
disease, and bifurcations is associated with acceptable primary success and complication
rates. However, the overall MACE rates were relatively high (34-62%), particularly in bifurcation lesions treated with stents in both
branches.
Results of Coronary Stenting with Different Indications
Finci L || Colombo A
Cardiovascular Interventions CVI 2000;5:8-13
Click here to view the full article in PDF
Coronary artery stents
Al Suwaidi J || Holmes DR Jr
Jama 2000;284:1828-36
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=0011025836
Intracoronary stents have become an essential component of the catheter-based treatment of coronary artery
disease. The evidence indicates that elective stenting, rather than provisional stenting or balloon angioplasty alone, improves clinical outcomes in the months following percutaneous coronary revascularization in a wide variety of clinical settings and lesion types
Guidelines
Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease
National Institute for Clinical Excellence
http://www.nice.org.uk
Click here to view the full article
Conclusions: 1) In sub-acute ischaemic heart disease IHD, especially stable angina and unstable angina, there is evidence for the effectiveness of a strategy of using stents as opposed to PTCA plus recourse to bailout stenting when acute closure
occurs. 2) The main impact is on reduced need for repeat PTCA. 3) Although based on randomised
trials, the available research is open to bias and hence there is not complete
certainty. 4) Our tentative view is that used in these conditions and this way, stents are likely to represent an efficient use of
resources. 5) The evidence on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of stents used provisionally is
inconclusive. 6) Outside use of stents in sub-acute IHD, the effectiveness and/or efficiency of stents use is not
known.
Medical therapy versus coronary angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease: a critical review of the literature
Blumenthal RS || Schulman SP
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:668-73
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=0010987582
For now, aggressive medical therapy and revascularization should be viewed as complementary rather than opposing
strategies. All patients with coronary heart disease should receive proven medical and lifestyle prescriptions to favorably alter the atherosclerotic
process. Percutaneous revascularization without comprehensive risk factor modification is a suboptimal therapeutic
strategy.
Click here to view the comments from
TCTMD.
CME - Treatment Update November 22, 2000 Medscape
Balloon optimization versus stent study
(BOSS): provisional stenting and early recoil after balloon angioplasty
Dangas G, et al.
Am J Cardiol 2000;85:957-61.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=10760334
Stent implantation neutralizes the impact of
preintervention arterial remodeling on subsequent target lesion
revascularization
Dangas G, et al.
Am J Cardiol 2000;86:452-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=10946042
Long-term follow-up study of coronary
reconstruction with multiple stents
Liu MW, et al.
Am Heart J 1999;137:292-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=9924163
Procedural results and late clinical
outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting
Kornowski R, et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:420-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=9973022
Indications for intracoronary stent
placement: the european view. Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the
European Society of Cardiology
Eeckhout E, et al.
Eur Heart J 1999;20:1014-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=10381853
Procedural results and late clinical
outcomes after placement of three or more stents in single coronary lesions
Kornowski R, et al.
Circulation 1998;97:1355-61.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=9577946
One-year follow-up of the Stent Restenosis
(STRESS I) Study
George CJ, et al.
Am J Cardiol 1998;81:860-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=9555775
The state of the stent: current practices,
controversies, and future trends
Serruys PW, et al.
Am J Cardiol 1996;78:4-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=8751839
Contemporary stent designs: technical
considerations, complications, role of intravascular ultrasound, and
anticoagulation therapy
Popma JJ, et al.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1996;39:111-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=8841006
Coronary artery stents. American College of
Cardiology
Pepine CJ, et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:782-94.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=8772772
Reduction in angioplasty complications after
the introduction of coronary stents: results from a consecutive series of 2242
patients
Altmann DB, et al.
Am Heart J 1996;132:503-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=8800018